Hundreds of new-build homes are in danger of crumbling after they were built with sub-standard concrete, a damning investigation has found.
Weak mortar that does not meet the recommended industry standards has been used on at least 13 estates in the UK, leaving the homes at risk of disintegrating.
The shocking revelation comes amid a housing crisis in the UK, with developers accused of cutting corners to finish homes in a bid to meet government targets.
Tests carried out on one of the homes affected showed the amount of sand present in the mortar was nearly three times higher than recommended.
It is thought the issue could affect thousands of other properties across the country, but developers are forcing desperate homeowners to first sign gagging orders before claiming compensation to save their crumbling homes.
The full extent of the issue is therefore clouded in mystery, with many homeowners potentially unaware of the dangers facing their properties.
Scroll down for video
Hundreds of new-build homes, such as that of Vincent Fascione (pictured), are in danger of crumbling after they were built with sub-standard concrete, an investigation has found
Mr Fascione was watching TV in 2016 when he heard a loud cracking noise from the external walls of his house. Upon exmaination, he found holes in the mortar of the wall
The gagging clause means those affected cannot even talk about their problems with neighbours on the same estate, who might unknowingly face similar structural issues.
In a single estate in the Scottish borders, it is believed leading housebuilder Taylor Wimpey has agreed to replace the mortar in more than 90 separate properties, according to the Victoria Derbyshire show.
It is currently unclear why such mortar would have been used, with construction experts suggesting errors may have been made with mixing the mortar on-site.
However MailOnline understands that larger homebuilders such as Taylor Wimpey mix their mortar offsite, given the vast quantities needed to build entire housing estates.
Taylor Wimpey builds thousands of homes every year, with latest figures from 2016 showing the company finished 14,112 properties and raked in a pre-tax profit of £732.9m.
In that year its chief executive Pete Fedfern raked in £3.8m, according to the Standard.
Some experts have blamed the weaker mortar on the industry's move to a new type of mortar created in factories which can pass a laboratory test but is not always strong enough when used in the real world.
Among those affected is Vincent Fascione, 70, who said he was watching TV in 2016 when he heard a loud cracking noise from the external walls of his house.
The next morning, he found a sand-like substance all over his front path and driveway.
Photographs and video from the time appear to show growing cracks in the mortar holding his bricks together.
Mr Fascione picked at the mortar with a screwdriver to show how easily the weaker building material comes away
It is currently unclear why such mortar would have been used, with construction experts suggesting errors may have been made with mixing the mortar on-site
In a single estate in the Scottish borders, it is believed leading housebuilder Taylor Wimpey has agreed to replace the mortar in more than 90 separate properties
Mr Fascione bought his property, in Coatbridge near Glasgow, in 2012 for £112,500.
After discovering the problem, he complained to Taylor Wimpey, who built the property, and to the NHBC, which provides warranties on new builds.
Guidelines state that the industry recognised profile of mortar in most cases should be one part cement to 5.5 parts sand.
However tests revealed that the sand present in Mr Fascione's mortar was three times higher that the recommended amount, meaning it structurally weaker.
In areas such as Coatbridge, where severe weather can mean faster erosion to buildings, it is suggested that the ratio of cement to sand should be even higher.
Mr Fascione said: 'I'll never buy a new-build house again. It's just been disastrous for me.'
A Taylor Wimpey spokesperson told MailOnline: 'Quality assurance tests are carried out on the mortar used on all of our sites and there are very few instances where it fails to meet the required standards.
'The mortar we use in the construction of our homes complies with building regulations and is of sufficient strength to meet the structural requirements of the houses and garages.
'We want to reassure our customers of our absolute commitment to delivering excellent quality homes and achieving high levels of customer satisfaction.
'On the rare occasions where issues do arise, we endeavour to resolve them as soon as practically possible.'
Other people who have brought their homes from a variety of different companies have taken to online forums to complain about their shoddy mortar, with dozens of such posts seen by MailOnline.
Last year it was reported that nearly 300 families a week were being forced to move into shoddy newly-built homes that have not been finished as builders cut corners to meet targets.
Buyers picking up keys to new homes to found leaks, mould, water-logged gardens, missing windows, badly fitted doors, broken toilets and gaps in the guttering.
In some cases, new-build buyers discovered more than 170 faults in their homes and having to wait months for a builder to fix them.
Some 93 per cent of buyers reported problems to their builders, according to a report by the all-party Parliamentary Group for Excellence in the Built Environment.
Of these, one in three discovered around 11 faults, and one in five hadmore than 16 problems, according to the data collected as part of a new home customer satisfaction survey by the National House Building Council and the Home Builders Federation.
The same survey showed satisfaction levels among new-build buyers had fallen from 90 per cent to 86 per cent.
The report estimated that this means around 15,500 buyers a year – or 298 a week – are 'dissatisfied' with their property.
Some experts blame the weaker mortar on the industry's move to a new type of mortar created in factories which can pass a laboratory test but is not always strong enough in the real world
Some homeowners have been asked to sign gagging orders to claim compensation, making it difficult to assess the scale of the problem, the Victoria Derbyshire show on BBC2 reported
Mr Fascione (pictured), from Coatbridge, near Glasgow, bought his semi-detached property in 2012 for £112,500
The new home nightmare affecting 300 families every week
Last year it was reported that nearly 300 families a week were being forced to move into shoddy newly-built homes that have not been finished as builders cut corners to meet targets.
Buyers picking up keys to new homes to found leaks, mould, water-logged gardens, missing windows, badly fitted doors, broken toilets and gaps in the guttering.
In some cases, new-build buyers discovered more than 170 faults in their homes and having to wait months for a builder to fix them.
Last year it was reported that nearly 300 families a week were being forced to move into shoddy newly-built homes that have not been finished as builders cut corners to meet targets
Some 93 per cent of buyers reported problems to their builders, according to a report by the all-party Parliamentary Group for Excellence in the Built Environment.
Of these, one in three discovered around 11 faults, and one in five hadmore than 16 problems, according to the data collected as part of a new home customer satisfaction survey by the National House Building Council and the Home Builders Federation.
The same survey showed satisfaction levels among new-build buyers had fallen from 90 per cent to 86 per cent.
The report estimated that this means around 15,500 buyers a year – or 298 a week – are 'dissatisfied' with their property.
Buyers picking up keys to new homes to found leaks, mould, water-logged gardens, missing windows, badly fitted doors, broken toilets and gaps in the guttering
https://textbacklinkexchanges.com/category/the-sun-world/
https://textbacklinkexchanges.com/hundreds-of-britains-new-build-homes-are-at-risk-of-crumbling/
News Pictures Hundreds of Britain's new-build homes are at risk of crumbling
You don’t have to pack away your bikini just because you’re the wrong side of 20. These body-beautiful stars reveal their secrets to staying in shape and prove you can smoulder in a two-piece, whatever your age. Read on and be bikini inspired!
TEENS
Hayden Panettiere
Size: 8
Age: 18
Height: 5ft 1in
Weight: 8st
To achieve her kick-ass figure, Hayden – who plays cheerleader Claire Bennet in Heroes – follows the ‘quartering’ rule. She eats only a quarter of the food on her plate, then waits 20 minutes before deciding whether she needs to eat again.
Hayden says: “I don’t have a model’s body, but I’m not one of those crazy girls who thinks that they’re fat. I’m OK with what I have.”
Nicollette says: “I don’t like diets – I see it, I eat it! I believe in eating healthily with lots of protein, vegetables and carbs to give you energy.”
kim cattrall
Size: 10-12
Age: 52
Height: 5ft 8in
Weight: 9st 4lb
SATC star Kim swears by gym sessions with Russian kettle bells (traditional cast-iron weights) and the South Beach Diet to give her the body she wants. To avoid overeating, Kim has a radical diet trick – squirting lemon juice on her leftovers – so she won’t carry on picking.
Kim says: “I am no super-thin Hollywood actress. I am built for men who like women to look like women.”
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/06/16/7090148-6467195-One_of_those_homes_was_owned_by_Vincent_Fascione_pictured_70_He_-m-32_1544112604827.jpg
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий