New photo Hammond lashes out at 'dreamers' who claim they can get a better Brexit deal

Philip Hammond today lashed out at 'dreamers' who think they can get a better Brexit deal than Theresa May.

The Chancellor delivered a stark warning that the PM has secured the 'best deal that is negotiable' as the government steps up its push ahead of a titanic Commons showdown.

In an exclusive article for MailOnline, Mr Hammond said blocking the settlement in the crunch vote on December 11 will fuel division in the country.

The intervention comes as the government is due to publish estimates of the economic impact of leaving the EU on various different terms.

Chancellor Philip Hammond (pictured today) has delivered a stark warning that the PM has secured the 'best deal that is negotiable' as the government steps up its push ahead of a titanic Commons showdown

The official analysis is expected to show that a no-deal exit would cost the economy £150billion over 15 years - while Mrs May's package would leave the UK £40billion worse off compared to current membership terms.

The Bank of England will also publish its own assessment of the potential outcomes.

The studies will inevitably reignite the bitter row about 'Project Fear' from the EU referendum campaign.   

In his article, Mr Hammond wrote: 'Let me be clear, leaving the EU next year without a deal would be very bad for our economy, but perhaps more than that, it would further entrench the divides which have held us back over the last few years.

'Because while it is true that some would like to see us leave on these terms, most people can see the damaging economic impact this would have on our country. 

'Equally, those calling for another referendum would achieve only more division and disunity. 

'And those who dream of "negotiating a better deal" are missing the point: this is the best deal that is negotiable.' 

Downing Street said the papers will cover a 'range of scenarios' as the PM presses the case that her agreement represents the only way to protect jobs and investment while avoiding the chaos of a no-deal break.

After what could be another bruising PMQs session, she will then travel to Scotland as she appeals over the heads of MPs to ordinary voters to support her plan.

The Treasury analysis is expected to conclude the UK will be far better off under the terms of Mrs May's controversial agreement with Brussels than if it faced a disorderly Brexit with a no-deal break.

Ministers have also agreed to publish their assessment of the impact on the economy if Britain were to stay in the EU, having been faced with the prospect of a damaging Commons defeat if they refused.

According to the Telegraph, the government study has found that over the next 15 years GDP will be between 1 and 2 per cent lower than if it stayed in the EU - some £40billion in cash terms. 

Under a no-deal Brexit GDP would be 7.6 per cent lower over the period, equivalent to £150billion.

A Norway-style agreement would leave GDP 1.4 per cent lower over 15 years and a free-trade agreement 4.9 per cent down.

Having spent yesterday campaigning in Wales and Northern Ireland, Mrs May will use her visit to Scotland to argue that agreement offers the prospect of an 'unprecedented economic partnership' with the EU after Brexit.

At the same time, she will emphasise that it will mean Britain leaves the Commons Fisheries Policy, enabling the country to decide who it allows to fish in UK waters.

The PM was in Wales yesterday (pictured), and will then travel to Scotland later as she appeals over the heads of MPs to ordinary voters to support her plan

'At long last, we will be 'an independent coastal state' again - taking back full sovereign control over our waters, and free to decide for ourselves who we allow to fish in our waters,' she is expected to say.

'The EU maintained throughout the negotiation process that it wanted to link overall access to markets to access to fisheries. It failed in the Withdrawal Agreement and it failed again in the Political Declaration.

'I have been robust in defending the interests of Scottish fisherman so far - and I will always be so.'

Ahead of her visit, Mrs May clashed with First Minister Nicola Sturgeon who released a report claiming her deal would cost people in Scotland £1,610 a year by 2030 people compared to if the UK had remained in the EU.

Ms Sturgeon said the 'backstop' being put in place to prevent the return to a hard border in Ireland could leave Scotland at a 'serious competitive disadvantage' to Northern Ireland.

'In short, it will make us poorer,' Ms Sturgeon said.

Denying May's deal will fuel 'division', Philip Hammond warns in article for MailOnline

It is no secret that the issue of our leaving the EU is one which has polarised opinion. It has divided the country between leavers and remainers; families, and, yes, political parties have all seen relationships strained by strongly held convictions on both sides.

But now we have reached agreement with the EU, it is the time to heal those divides. A divided country is a poorer country, so let us end all talk of who 'won' or 'lost' in the referendum and work together in a spirit of compromise to secure Britain's future outside the European Union.

The agreement reached between us and the 27 other EU countries at the weekend is a major milestone in securing a good Brexit deal for our country – a deal to which we should all give our full support.

It brings the country back together with a way forward that takes us out of the European Union and delivers on the result of the referendum, while protecting jobs, security and the integrity of the United Kingdom. But it also reassures those who were worried about leaving the European Union that we will have a close future trading, security and economic partnership with our nearest neighbours in Europe, protecting our prosperity and securing our country.

Labour's approach would reignite debates that the country has moved beyond. Jeremy Corbyn admits he hasn't even read the Brexit deal and yet says he is opposed to it. He promised to respect the country's decision to leave, but is now opening the door to re-running the referendum. He says his party will put jobs and the economy first, but he has no alternative plan for a deal that honours the referendum. His approach would simply cause more division and uncertainty while the government's approach brings certainty with a deal that protects jobs and is good for the economy.

Let me also be clear, leaving the EU next year without a deal would be very bad for our economy, but perhaps more than that, it would further entrench the divides which have held us back over the last few years. Because while it is true that some would like to see us leave on these terms, most people can see the damaging economic impact this would have on our country. Equally, those calling for another referendum would achieve only more division and disunity. And those who dream of 'negotiating a better deal' are missing the point: this is the best deal that is negotiable.

Crucially, the deal which we have agreed with the European Union is one which delivers on the results of the referendum. The majority of this country voted to leave the EU, and we must deliver on that vote in the most sensible way possible. And that is what we are doing: we are regaining our sovereignty, but we are not cutting ourselves off from our neighbours. We are taking back control, but we are not doing so to the detriment of everything else.

As Chancellor, I spend much of my time speaking to businesses big and small. As in the country, opinion amongst them on leaving the EU was divided. But overwhelmingly now, they tell me that the main thing holding this country back is uncertainty. They see the pragmatic approach the Prime Minister and her negotiators have taken and they want us to get on with things so they can get on with investing in Britain's future. And that is exactly what we will do.

Now is the time to offer the hand of friendship across the country's divide; to reunite those who have been driven apart by Brexit; and to come together and work in the national interest. This is the best deal possible – it will deliver Brexit while helping to heal the country, get businesses investing again, and set us on the path to a united, brighter future.

https://textbacklinkexchanges.com/category/the-sun-world/
https://textbacklinkexchanges.com/hammond-lashes-out-at-dreamers-who-claim-they-can-get-a-better-brexit-deal/
News Pictures Hammond lashes out at 'dreamers' who claim they can get a better Brexit deal

You don’t have to pack away your bikini just because you’re the wrong side of 20. These body-beautiful stars reveal their secrets to staying in shape and prove you can smoulder in a two-piece, whatever your age. Read on and be bikini inspired!

TEENS
Hayden Panettiere
Size: 8
Age: 18
Height: 5ft 1in
Weight: 8st

To achieve her kick-ass figure, Hayden – who plays cheerleader Claire Bennet in Heroes – follows the ‘quartering’ rule. She eats only a quarter of the food on her plate, then waits 20 minutes before deciding whether she needs to eat again.

Hayden says: “I don’t have a model’s body, but I’m not one of those crazy girls who thinks that they’re fat. I’m OK with what I have.”

Nicollette says: “I don’t like diets – I see it, I eat it! I believe in eating healthily with lots of protein, vegetables and carbs to give you energy.”

kim cattrall

Size: 10-12
Age: 52
Height: 5ft 8in
Weight: 9st 4lb

SATC star Kim swears by gym sessions with Russian kettle bells (traditional cast-iron weights) and the South Beach Diet to give her the body she wants. To avoid overeating, Kim has a radical diet trick – squirting lemon juice on her leftovers – so she won’t carry on picking.

Kim says: “I am no super-thin Hollywood actress. I am built for men who like women to look like women.”
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/11/28/08/6734604-6437001-image-a-18_1543392452616.jpg