"Many Photos" - National Enquirer DEFENDS Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez emails

American Media is defending emails sent by the National Enquirer's Chief Content Officer and the firm's legal team threatening to publish nude photos of Jeff Bezos and his mistress if he did not drop an investigation into how editors learned of the billionaire's affair.  

'American Media believes fervently that it acted lawfully in the reporting of the story of Mr. Bezos. Further, at the time of the recent allegations made by Mr. Bezos, it was in good faith negotiations to resolve all matters with him,' the company said in a statement released on Friday. 

'Nonetheless, in light of the nature of the allegations published by Mr. Bezos, the Board has convened and determined that it should promptly and thoroughly investigate the claims. Upon completion of that investigation, the Board will take whatever appropriate action is necessary.'

The American Media board is comprised of four individuals, including: owner David Pecker; Evan Ratner, a partner at Chatham Asset Management; Barry Schwartz, also a partner at at Chatham Asset Management; and David R. Hughes, the former executive vice president, treasurer and chief financial officer of Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc. 

Chatham Asset Management has an 80 percent stake in American Media according to Bloomberg. 

Meanwhile, it was revealed on Friday that federal prosecutors were reviewing the emails sent by AMI to Bezos in order to determine if the company violated its immunity deal by blackmailing Bezos. 

Scroll down for videos 

Doubling down: American Media has defended their dealings with billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos in a statement, saying the company 'acted lawfully' (AMI owner David Pecker on left, Chief Content Creator Dylan Howard on right)

Expose exposed: Jeff Bezos has published emails sent to him by an editor at the National Enquirer in which he is told nude photos will be published of him and Lauren Sanchez (Sanchez and Bezos above on October 30)

These emails were sent just a few months after American Media agreed to fully cooperate with the Department of Justice in an ongoing investigation involving President Trump.

That agreement was made as part of an immunity deal with attorneys from the Southern District of New York, but that deal can be revoked if it is discovered that the company has committed an illegal act, such as blackmail or extortion. 

That would create a huge problem for AMI, since they admitted to making a $150,000 payment 'in concert with a candidate’s presidential campaign, and in order to ensure that the woman did not publicize damaging allegations about the candidate before the 2016 presidential election.' 

As part of the initial deal, AMI also 'admitted that its principal purpose in making the payment was to suppress the woman's story so as to prevent it from influencing the election.'

That woman was Karen McDougal, who claims she had an affair with President Donald Trump.

A spokesperson with the Southern District of New York declined to comment on the status of that deal when contacted by DailyMail.com on Friday morning. 

In one email, Howard comments that 'with The Washington Post poised to publish unsubstantiated rumors of The National Enquirer's initial report, I wanted to describe to you the photos obtained during our newsgathering [sic].'

He then goes on to claim that the Enquirer has a 'd*** pic' sent by Bezos and a photo that shows Sanchez's 'nether region.'

After listing the images, Howard writes: 'It would give no editor pleasure to send this email. I hope common sense can prevail - and quickly.'

Bezos did respond quickly, by posting that letter and two others online.

The first email was sent on February 5, a proposed agreement was sent on February 6 and a third email was sent at an unknown date in response to a February 4 note sent by Bezos' lawyer Marty Singer to Howard.  

'Well, that got my attention. But not in the way they likely hoped. Any personal embarrassment AMI could cause me takes a back seat because there's a much more important matter involved here,' explained Bezos in a post on Medium. 

'If in my position I can't stand up to this kind of extortion, how many people can?' 

The images that the Enquirer has obtained, according to Howard, include: 

• A 'below the belt selfie' 


• Mr. Bezos' face selfie at what appears to be a business meeting; Ms. Sanchez response - a photograph of her smoking a cigar in what appears to be a simulated oral sex scene


• A shirtless Mr. Bezos holding his phone in his left hand — while wearing his wedding ring. He's wearing either tight black cargo pants or shorts — and his semi-erect manhood is penetrating the zipper of said garment


• A full-length body selfie of Mr. Bezos wearing just a pair of tight black boxer-briefs or trunks, with his phone in his left hand — while wearing his wedding ring


• A selfie of Mr. Bezos fully clothed


• A full-length scantily-clad body shot with short trunks


• A naked selfie in a bathroom — while wearing his wedding ring. Mr. Bezos is wearing nothing but a white towel — and the top of his pubic region can be seen 


• Ms. Sanchez wearing a plunging red neckline dress revealing her cleavage and a glimpse of her nether region


• Ms. Sanchez wearing a two-piece red bikini with gold detail dress revealing her cleavage.'

'These communications cement AMI's long-earned reputation for weaponizing journalistic privileges, hiding behind important protections, and ignoring the tenets and purpose of true journalism,' wrote Bezos.

'Of course I don't want personal photos published, but I also won't participate in their well-known practice of blackmail, political favors, political attacks, and corruption. I prefer to stand up, roll this log over, and see what crawls out.'  

But the company's alleged threat to Bezos could be interpreted as a breach, potentially opening it to prosecution.  

In a subsequent email, an attorney for American Media outlines a proposed agreement, which was also published by Bezos. 

The terms include:  

• A full and complete mutual release of all claims that American Media, on the one hand, and Jeff Bezos and Gavin de Becker (the 'Bezos Parties'), on the other, may have against each other.

• A public, mutually-agreed upon acknowledgment from the Bezos Parties, released through a mutually-agreeable news outlet, affirming that they have no knowledge or basis for suggesting that AM's coverage was politically motivated or influenced by political forces, and an agreement that they will cease referring to such a possibility.

The National Enquirer's cover story on Bezos' divorce and relationship with Sanchez that led to his investigation 

• AM agrees not to publish, distribute, share, or describe unpublished texts and photos (the 'Unpublished Materials').

• AM affirms that it undertook no electronic eavesdropping in connection with its reporting and has no knowledge of such conduct.

• The agreement is completely confidential.

• In the case of a breach of the agreement by one or more of the Bezos Parties, AM is released from its obligations under the agreement, and may publish the Unpublished Materials.

• Any other disputes arising out of this agreement shall first be submitted to JAMS mediation in California

Jon Fine, the lawyer who wrote the terms of the deal, worked under Bezos at Amazon for nine years, according to his LinkedIn page. 

He was employed as a lawyer, director and vice president at Amazon between 2006 and 2015, he writes on his online profile. 

The third and final email shared by Bezos was far more clear about the deal. 

'As I advised previously, we stand by the legality of our newsgathering and reporting on this matter of public interest and concern. Moreover, American Media is undeterred from continuing its reporting on a story that is unambiguously in the public interest — a position Mr. Bezos clearly appreciates as reflected in Boies Schiller January 9 letter to American Media stating that your client 'does not intend to discourage reporting about him' and 'supports journalistic efforts,' read the email.

'That said, if your client agrees to cease and desist such defamatory behavior, we are willing to engage in constructive conversations regarding the texts and photos which we have in our possession. Dylan Howard stands ready to discuss the matter at your convenience.'

Bezos had hired Gavin de Becker to look into who leaked the images and text messages he and Sanchez had exchanged over the past year. 

De Becker allegedly suspects that a 'government entity' could have gotten hold of the messages. 

Washington Post reporter Manuel Roig-Franzia said live on air that de Becker had given 'interesting insights into the backstages of this whole drama'. 

'He does not believe that Jeff Bezos's phone was hacked - he thinks it's possible that a government entity might have gotten a hold of his text messages,' he said.    

Bezos published the contents of the email he received on Tuesday afternoon

On January 13, Trump celebrated The National Enquirer's story exposing Bezos' affair 

It came after the world's richest man announced he was splitting with wife MacKenzie 

In interviews with both The Daily Beast and The Washington Post, de Becker stated his belief that Sanchez's brother Michael could have leaked the information. 

Michael is pro-Trump, friendly with both Roger Stone and Carter Page and learned about his sister's affair in April of last year.

Those facts came not from de Becker, but Michael himself in his own interview with the Post. 

It was not who leaked the news, but why it was leaked that seemed to be of concern to David Pecker and American media, claims Bezos.  

'Several days ago, an AMI leader advised us that Mr. Pecker is "apoplectic" about our investigation. For reasons still to be better understood, the Saudi angle seems to hit a particularly sensitive nerve,' explained Bezos.

'A few days after hearing about Mr. Pecker's apoplexy, we were approached, verbally at first, with an offer. They said they had more of my text messages and photos that they would publish if we didn't stop our investigation.'

Last night Lauren Sanchez's estranged husband, Patrick Whitesell, was seen on a date in West Hollywood with model Keira Alexa as the row erupted.  

Out and about: Whitesell, left, speaks on his cell phone as he leaves the bar in California joined by model Keira Alexa, right, who carried her red handbag and a coat with her 

NATIONAL ENQUIRER EMAILS TO BEZOS  

From: Howard, Dylan [dhoward@amilink.com] (Chief Content Officer, AMI) Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 3:33 PM To: Martin Singer (litigation counsel for Mr. de Becker) Subject:. Jeff Bezos & Ms. Lauren Sanchez Photos

CONFIDENTIAL & NOT FOR DISTRIBIUTION

Marty:

I am leaving the office for the night. I will be available on my cell — 917 XXX-XXXX.

However, in the interests of expediating this situation, and with The Washington Post poised to publish unsubstantiated rumors of The National Enquirer’s initial report, I wanted to describe to you the photos obtained during our newsgathering.

In addition to the “below the belt selfie — otherwise colloquially known as a ‘d*ck pick’” — The Enquirer obtained a further nine images. These include:

· Mr. Bezos face selfie at what appears to be a business meeting.

· Ms. Sanchez response — a photograph of her smoking a cigar in what appears to be a simulated oral sex scene.

· A shirtless Mr. Bezos holding his phone in his left hand — while wearing his wedding ring. He’s wearing either tight black cargo pants or shorts — and his semi-erect manhood is penetrating the zipper of said garment.

· A full-length body selfie of Mr. Bezos wearing just a pair of tight black boxer-briefs or trunks, with his phone in his left hand — while wearing his wedding ring.

· A selfie of Mr. Bezos fully clothed.

· A full-length scantily-clad body shot with short trunks.

· A naked selfie in a bathroom — while wearing his wedding ring. Mr. Bezos is wearing nothing but a white towel — and the top of his pubic region can be seen.

· Ms. Sanchez wearing a plunging red neckline dress revealing her cleavage and a glimpse of her nether region.

· Ms. Sanchez wearing a two-piece red bikini with gold detail dress revealing her cleavage.

It would give no editor pleasure to send this email. I hope common sense can prevail — and quickly.

Dylan

__________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Fine, Jon [jfine@amilink.com] (Deputy General Counsel, AMI)Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2019 5:57 PMTo: Martin Singer (Mr de Becker’s attorney)Subject: Re: EXTERNAL* RE: Bezos et al / American Media et al

Marty -

Here are our proposed terms:

1. A full and complete mutual release of all claims that American Media, on the one hand, and Jeff Bezos and Gavin de Becker (the “Bezos Parties”), on the other, may have against each other.

2. A public, mutually-agreed upon acknowledgment from the Bezos Parties, released through a mutually-agreeable news outlet, affirming that they have no knowledge or basis for suggesting that AM’s coverage was politically motivated or influenced by political forces, and an agreement that they will cease referring to such a possibility.

3. AM agrees not to publish, distribute, share, or describe unpublished texts and photos (the “Unpublished Materials”).

4. AM affirms that it undertook no electronic eavesdropping in connection with its reporting and has no knowledge of such conduct.

5. The agreement is completely confidential.

6. In the case of a breach of the agreement by one or more of the Bezos Parties, AM is released from its obligations under the agreement, and may publish the Unpublished Materials.

7. Any other disputes arising out of this agreement shall first be submitted to JAMS mediation in California

Thank you,

Jon

Deputy General Counsel, Media

American Media, LLC

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Jon P. Fine

Deputy General Counsel, Media

O: (212) 743–6513 C: (347) 920–6541

jfine@amilink.com

February 5, 2019

Via email:

mdsinger@lavelysinger.com

Martin D. Singer

Laveley & Singer

Re: Jeff Bezos / American Media, LLC, et al.

Dear Mr. Singer:

I write in response to your February 4, 2019, letter to Dylan Howard, and to address serious concerns we have regarding the continuing defamatory activities of your client and his representatives regarding American Media’s motivations in its recent reporting about your client.

As a primary matter, please be advised that our newsgathering and reporting on matters involving your client, including any use of your client’s “private photographs,” has been, and will continue to be, consistent with applicable laws. As you know, “the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies . . . for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting . . . is not an infringement of copyright.” 17 USC Sec. 107. With millions of Americans having a vested interest in the success of Amazon, of which your client remains founder, chairman, CEO, and president, an exploration of Mr. Bezos’ judgment as reflected by his texts and photos is indeed newsworthy and in the public interest.

Beyond the copyright issues you raise, we also find it necessary to address various unsubstantiated defamatory statements and scurrilous rumors attributed to your client’s representatives in the press suggesting that “strong leads point to political motives”1 in the publication of The National Enquirer story. Indeed, you yourself declared the “politically motivated underpinnings” of our reporting to be “self-evident” in your correspondence on Mr. de Becker’s behalf to Mr. Howard dated January 31, 2019.

Once again, as I advised you in my February 1 response to your January 31 correspondence, American Media emphatically rejects any assertion that its reporting was instigated, dictated or influenced in any manner by external forces, political or otherwise. Simply put, this was and is a news story.

Yet, it is our understanding that your client’s representatives, including the Washington Post, continue to pursue and to disseminate these false and spurious allegations in a manner that is injurious to American Media and its executives.

Accordingly, we hereby demand that you cease and desist such defamatory conduct immediately. Any further dissemination of these false, vicious, speculative and unsubstantiated statements is done at your client’s peril.Absent the immediate cessation of the defamatory conduct, we will have no choice but to pursue all remedies available under applicable law.

As I advised previously, we stand by the legality of our newsgathering and reporting on this matter of public interest and concern. Moreover, American Media is undeterred from continuing its reporting on a story that is unambiguously in the public interest — a position Mr. Bezos clearly appreciates as reflected in Boies Schiller January 9 letter to American Media stating that your client “does not intend to discourage reporting about him” and “supports journalistic efforts.”

That said, if your client agrees to cease and desist such defamatory behavior, we are willing to engage in constructive conversations regarding the texts and photos which we have in our possession. Dylan Howard stands ready to discuss the matter at your convenience.

All other rights, claims, counterclaims and defenses are specifically reserved and not waived.

Sincerely

 

Pecker's ties to President Trump and Saudi Arabia were detailed in an March 2018 report in The New York Times.

It all began with Pecker being introduced to Kacy Grine, a French businessman with strong ties to Saudi Arabia.

More specifically, according to the report, Grine 'acts as an intermediary between Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Western businesses.' 

That introduction was orchestrated by Ari Emanuel reported the Times.

That was a year before the affair between Bezos and Sanchez began, but it should be noted that Emanuel's business partner is Sanchez's estranged husband Patrick Whitesell. 

Pecker and Grine reportedly discussed the business landscape in the Middle East, and soon the publisher began making investments in the region.

American Media published a glossy magazine promoting the country that sold for $13.99 and was 100 pages long with no advertisements called A New Kingdom

The two men grew close, and when Pecker was invited to see his friend in the White House in July of 2017 he brought along Grine as his guest. 

After meeting with the president and his son-in-law Jared Kushner, the group went to dinner, according to the Times.

News of this meeting made its way back to Saudi Arabia, and Pecker was soon viewed as a businessman with an enormous amount of pull and power thanks to his ties to the current administration.

In September of that year, Pecker was in Saudi Arabia meeting with the Crown Prince. 

That fact was ascertained thanks to a email exchange he had with Harvey Weinstein about purchasing Rolling Stone, a week before the disgraced mogul was outed as a sexual predator by the Times and New Yorker.

And in January, Pecker reportedly sought out Saudi investments in his attempt to purchase Time magazine, per two sources.

That acquisition has always been a goal of Pecker's, and in 2013 Trump tweeted: 'David Pecker would be a brilliant choice as CEO of TIME Magazine — nobody could bring it back like David!' 

American Media even published a glossy magazine promoting the country that sold for $13.99 and was 100 pages long with no advertisements called A New Kingdom.

The Associated Press later reported that the magazine 'was quietly shared with officials at the Saudi Embassy in Washington almost three weeks before its publication.' 

That magazine made no mention of the human right violations in Saudi Arabia, which have been most closely covered and detailed by the Bezos-owned Washington Post. 

Bezos has hired Gavin de Becker to look into who leaked the images and text messages he and Sanchez had exchanged over the past year

That coverage has amplified considerably ever since the murder of Saudi dissident Jamal Khashoggi, who was a columnist for the Post. 

Khashoggi was murdered at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul on October 2 while trying to obtain paperwork for his upcoming marriage to a Turkish woman.

An investigation that was carried out by Turkish officials concluded that Khashoggi was killed by a team of 15 Saudis at the kingdom's diplomatic mission.

Saudi officials denied these reports for weeks, but after international outcry declared that the murder was the result of a 'rogue' operation.  

At the same time, officials in Riyadh denied allegations that Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was involved in any way with the murder.

The New York Times reported on Thursday however that in a wire intercepted by America intelligence officials in 2017, the Crown Prince told an aide he would use 'a bullet' on the journalist if he did not return to the US and stop reporting on the country's violations of human rights.

US Intelligence believes that the Crown Prince ordered the murder, as do experts with the United Nations and a majority of both Republican and Democratic lawmakers in Washington DC. 

President Trump meanwhile has declared very publicly that he stands by the Crown Prince. 

JEFF BEZOS FIRES BACK AFTER ENQUIRER  BLACKMAIL THREAT 

Something unusual happened to me yesterday. Actually, for me it wasn’t just unusual — it was a first. I was made an offer I couldn’t refuse. Or at least that’s what the top people at the National Enquirer thought. I’m glad they thought that, because it emboldened them to put it all in writing. Rather than capitulate to extortion and blackmail, I’ve decided to publish exactly what they sent me, despite the personal cost and embarrassment they threaten.

AMI, the owner of the National Enquirer, led by David Pecker, recently entered into an immunity deal with the Department of Justice related to their role in the so-called “Catch and Kill” process on behalf of President Trump and his election campaign. Mr. Pecker and his company have also been investigated for various actions they’ve taken on behalf of the Saudi Government.

And sometimes Mr. Pecker mixes it all together:

“After Mr. Trump became president, he rewarded Mr. Pecker’s loyalty with a White House dinner to which the media executive brought a guest with important ties to the royals in Saudi Arabia. At the time, Mr. Pecker was pursuing business there while also hunting for financing for acquisitions…”

Federal investigators and legitimate media have of course suspected and proved that Mr. Pecker has used the Enquirer and AMI for political reasons. And yet AMI keeps claiming otherwise:

“American Media emphatically rejects any assertion that its reporting was instigated, dictated or influenced in any manner by external forces, political or otherwise.”

Of course, legitimate media have been challenging that assertion for a long time.

I didn’t know much about most of that a few weeks ago when intimate texts messages from me were published in the National Enquirer. I engaged investigators to learn how those texts were obtained, and to determine the motives for the many unusual actions taken by the Enquirer. As it turns out, there are now several independent investigations looking into this matter.

To lead my investigation, I retained Gavin de Becker. I’ve known Mr. de Becker for twenty years, his expertise in this arena is excellent, and he’s one of the smartest and most capable leaders I know. I asked him to prioritize protecting my time since I have other things I prefer to work on and to proceed with whatever budget he needed to pursue the facts in this matter.

Here’s a piece of context: My ownership of the Washington Post is a complexifier for me. It’s unavoidable that certain powerful people who experience Washington Post news coverage will wrongly conclude I am their enemy.

President Trump is one of those people, obvious by his many tweets. Also, The Post’s essential and unrelenting coverage of the murder of its columnist Jamal Khashoggi is undoubtedly unpopular in certain circles.

(Even though The Post is a complexifier for me, I do not at all regret my investment. The Post is a critical institution with a critical mission. My stewardship of The Post and my support of its mission, which will remain unswerving, is something I will be most proud of when I’m 90 and reviewing my life, if I’m lucky enough to live that long, regardless of any complexities it creates for me.)

Back to the story: Several days ago, an AMI leader advised us that Mr. Pecker is “apoplectic” about our investigation. For reasons still to be better understood, the Saudi angle seems to hit a particularly sensitive nerve.

A few days after hearing about Mr. Pecker’s apoplexy, we were approached, verbally at first, with an offer. They said they had more of my text messages and photos that they would publish if we didn’t stop our investigation.

My lawyers argued that AMI has no right to publish photos since any person holds the copyright to their own photos, and since the photos in themselves don’t add anything newsworthy.

AMI’s claim of newsworthiness is that the photos are necessary to show Amazon shareholders that my business judgment is terrible. I founded Amazon in my garage 24 years ago, and drove all the packages to the post office myself. Today, Amazon employs more than 600,000 people, just finished its most profitable year ever, even while investing heavily in new initiatives, and it’s usually somewhere between the #1 and #5 most valuable company in the world. I will let those results speak for themselves.

OK, back to their threat to publish intimate photos of me. I guess we (me, my lawyers, and Gavin de Becker) didn’t react to the generalized threat with enough fear, so they sent this.

Well, that got my attention. But not in the way they likely hoped. Any personal embarrassment AMI could cause me takes a back seat because there’s a much more important matter involved here. If in my position I can’t stand up to this kind of extortion, how many people can? (On that point, numerous people have contacted our investigation team about their similar experiences with AMI, and how they needed to capitulate because, for example, their livelihoods were at stake.)

In the AMI letters I’m making public, you will see the precise details of their extortionate proposal: They will publish the personal photos unless Gavin de Becker and I make the specific false public statement to the press that we “have no knowledge or basis for suggesting that AMI’s coverage was politically motivated or influenced by political forces.”

If we do not agree to affirmatively publicize that specific lie, they say they’ll publish the photos, and quickly. And there’s an associated threat: They’ll keep the photos on hand and publish them in the future if we ever deviate from that lie.

Be assured, no real journalists ever propose anything like what is happening here: I will not report embarrassing information about you if you do X for me. And if you don’t do X quickly, I will report the embarrassing information.

Nothing I might write here could tell the National Enquirer story as eloquently as their own words below.

These communications cement AMI’s long-earned reputation for weaponizing journalistic privileges, hiding behind important protections, and ignoring the tenets and purpose of true journalism. Of course I don’t want personal photos published, but I also won’t participate in their well-known practice of blackmail, political favors, political attacks, and corruption. I prefer to stand up, roll this log over, and see what crawls out.

Sincerely,

Jeff Bezos

photo link
https://textbacklinkexchanges.com/national-enquirer-defends-jeff-bezos-and-lauren-sanchez-emails/
News Photo National Enquirer DEFENDS Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez emails
Advertising
You don’t have to pack away your dress just because you’re the wrong side of 20. These body-beautiful stars reveal their secrets to staying in shape and prove you can smoulder in a two-piece, whatever your age. Read on and be bikini inspired!

Kim says: “I am no super-thin Hollywood actress. I am built for men who like women to look like women.”
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/02/08/15/9561818-6683059-image-a-3_1549639535856.jpg